![]() ![]() It was about society's differences and human sufferings. Auden was about the paintings in the Museum of Fine Arts and described many themes. Overall, the painting depicted that humans had provincial views and therefore did not see the other people that needed help. The man in the bottom right corner was looking at the water, but he still did not try to save Icarus. Instead, most of them were carrying on with their lives. This can be seen in the painting by observing how all the people were not really facing the direction of Icarus. It can be added that the people are blinded by ignorance of others’ problems. One way is that the people were so blinded by their own successes and enjoyable life that they could not see Icarus drowning.Īnother interpretation is that the people were so caught up in their own struggles in life that they choose not to care for others, like how the people in the painting did not save Icarus. ![]() The painting can be interpreted in two ways. Everything is perfect in the painting, but there is a person who he showed drowning in the sea, which is believed to be Icarus. In the painting, many people are continuing on with their life for instance the farmer doing his job in the field, the person who is busy in different activity, the man gazing into the sunset, and many ships in the water. He showed the painting in a very different way as compared to the Greek myth. The simplicity of his painting has deeper meanings. Bruegel depicted rural people in real-life settings many of his works show peasants farming, going to market, or celebrating the harvest. In his painting, he portrays the scene when Icarus fell into the sea. The painting “Landscape with the Fall of Icarus” by Peter Bruegel, which refuted the myth of Icarus and Daedalus, relates a situation about Daedalus and Icarus.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |